Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (246571)	10/25/2007 9:59:17 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

He pulls this crap once a year. More often than that! Why are you so emotional and frought with anxiety when it comes up? Lets discuss ALL possible solutions... Think hypothetically. If removing Israel's Jewishness WOULD result in living peacefully with all the involved parties, and nobody died, and relgion became a personal matter rather than a government matter, would you still be so opposed to it? Is it preferable to have Jewish Israel and be in perpetual war to non-Jewish Pasreal and no death and no war? For you, perhaps, but for the world, no. It's fine to object to it because you think it wouldn't work. Nadine has done that basically with the argument the other guys would screw it up. So far there is none of the other guys arguing to the contrary, so that's where it dies out. But to state that it shouldn't even be discussed because, well, uhhmm, because, IT'S ANTI-SEMETIC!! or somesuch nonsense, show some piggity headedness on your side. For those who aren't aware of the Pasreal solution to the Israel-Pal conflict, here it is: Message 23214027