SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (246676)10/25/2007 4:27:40 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Do you disagree with that?

As I've told you before, I don't believe there is a solution that would reconcile the people of that region ... at least not in the conventionally diplomatic sense.



To: michael97123 who wrote (246676)10/25/2007 6:52:21 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Pasrael would make jews a minority in the new state.

No, even if you believe the current Pal population figures, which are inflated, 'Pasreal' would have about 6 million Jews and 4 million Arabs. But the Arab birthrate is higher.



To: michael97123 who wrote (246676)10/29/2007 5:44:02 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Thats not the problem, the problem is that the majority now arab and muslim would not choose to peacefully coexist and would force the jews out of the region ultimatlely in violent fashion.

Now you're the spokesperson for the Muslims? How in the world did you get the ability to determine what non-Jews would do if they were offered complete equality under the law in the entirety of the disputed land? Hmmmm?

You presume the non-Jews would do to the Jews what the Israelis did to the Palestinians in 1948, but as with all things that are in the future, you really have no idea.....