Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (2356)	10/29/2007 1:51:12 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

"That wasn't bias that was fact." What is factual is that it is an unreal number. It relies upon smoke an mirrors to claim that people who are between jobs and temporarily between insurance coverage are uninsured. I also counts people who elect to decline coverage because the policy their employer offers is outrageously expensive for them relative to the costs of declining it. "now you are calling me a liberal that hangs out with gays and transgenders? Wow. Not nice to have a policy disagreement with Peter." If you hung out with conservative you would not be able to sustain your socialist beliefs. Facts and truth shined on socialism drives it into the shadows. If you wish to pretend that I made a claim that I did not, feel free. They already are. The US is a primary destination after government bureaucrats deny them the right to life saving medical procedures or inform them that the delay for medical treatment (or diagnosis) is excessively long. "If you state it as fact it's best to have some supporting evidence. Prove it." And I suggest that you prove that medical tourism is mostly leaving the US.