Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: octavian who wrote (1751)	10/29/2007 2:06:44 AM
From: Math Junkie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2121

However, I must say that in regards to stockalot's quote above, there are some* things that we just KNOW, even if we can't actually PROVE them.* Octavian, that's called an OPINION, LOL! The claim that Brinker's subscribers somehow needed him to tell them to sell if they wanted to hold a model portfolio and had something that Brinker's recommendations on page eight did not include, seems very insulting to Brinker's subscribers, and completely implausible. What Brinker "wanted" was completely irrelevant. What he wrote and recommended is the only thing that matters (and it's certainly the only thing that's provable). However, since people seem to want to speculate on what was in his mind, I guess I might as well join in: My guess is that the reason Brinker didn't explicitly tell people to sell QQQ if they wanted to be in a model portfolio is that he didn't want to admit that he screwed up by not specifying in the bulletin whether the model portfolios were participating or not. Thus, he may have wanted people to put two and two together without his having to say it.