SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (2554)10/30/2007 7:07:08 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
While I oppose such nationalization of the insurance industry, but it does make a lot more sense than having private insurance companies with mandates to give quality coverage to people who already have severe and expensive conditions, at low prices.

If universal health insurance coverage trumps all other concerns, than you either have the government provide insurance for everyone or you have it provide insurance for the poor and the poor risks.

Of course it isn't the only concern, or one that trumps everything else...



To: Road Walker who wrote (2554)11/1/2007 10:57:20 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42652
 
And that's the reason we need to take it out of the hands of the insurance companies, as the other industrialized nations have done.

So you want to put charity in the hands of the government rather than the insurance companies?

I have been rather fond of the concept of private charity. I think it would be a shame for society to lose it.