SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gib Bogle who wrote (24648)10/30/2007 7:58:55 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217764
 
to process visa applications from friendlies, all none of them, of course

and to lose stacks of billions more efficiently, naturally

and to recommend the passage of resolutions in washington that would instruct the subjugees what to do, as usual

chortle chortle chortle cackle cough wink elbow tears and more chortle



To: Gib Bogle who wrote (24648)10/31/2007 11:09:25 PM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217764
 
2 parties are cost effective for plutocrats not to spend too much of their money. If there were like 6 parties they would overspend to declare the winning guy who'd be protecting their wealth.

Bush after Bush now Clinton after Clinton? Easy and less expensive to declare the winner.

In Brazil we have politicians being prosecuted and we expose everything.

In the US when we have a scandal is a senator in the bathroom doing some monkey business. The media is not going about everything the politicians do. Draft dodger, crash the car while drunk. That's OK. A boquete in the White House with an intern. But we don’t see the suitcase full of cash!!!!

But it is not like us. Down there we chase the bastards wherever they go. Find cash changing hands, bug phone lines to and video tape dirty dealings...

Thus it gives to the ignorant populace the idea: <<Those Brazilians are wayo people; here we are all honest politicians.>>

We trotted a corrupt president (Collor) booted unceremoniously out of office. There's no definition of sex. No sir. There we go by the book and kick the guy out.



To: Gib Bogle who wrote (24648)11/11/2007 9:15:39 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217764
 
Nope.

Not subjugated, not conquered by many meanings of the word, not occupies in the sense of being the occupying power. Well the military occupies in the sense of being at, and taking up space in, a location, but that definition isn't very meaningful in this context, and isn't what is normally referred to as a military occupation.