SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (23804)10/31/2007 10:24:11 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
are underlines more important then bold, or should I just skip your whole annoying post ?



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (23804)10/31/2007 12:22:23 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Corporations are obviously things that can live for an indefinite period. There is no reason for them to have expirations dates. You say you don't have a problem with them having a separate legal identity, and in the context of my reply it seems like you don't have a problem with limited liability for shareholders. So what exactly are you against?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News