SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gvatty who wrote (243114)10/31/2007 5:22:47 PM
From: TenchusatsuRespond to of 275872
 
Gvatty, > Why are they so capacity restrained?

Heck if I knew. I don't follow how many fabs Intel has anymore.

But I do know that this isn't the first time people on this thread have jumped to conclusions regarding "yield problems." Samo samo ...

a) Intel has X number of fabs.
b) Each should be producing Y number of chips.
c) If X times Y is greater than Intel's actual unit sales, that means Intel must be having "yield problems."
d) I'm a "genius."

Tenchusatsu



To: gvatty who wrote (243114)10/31/2007 7:41:56 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Intel fab status and plans, late 2005: intel.com
Fab 32 opens: intel.com
Fab 24-2 in Ireland opens: intel.com
Fab 11X to transition from 90 to 45nm: intel.com

Petz