Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: quehubo who wrote (93073)	11/3/2007 4:41:48 PM
From: tom pope	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206117

The American public would have Tehran radioactive if necessary to remove the threat rather than live life without cheap oil. Making Tehran radioactive will ensure a continuing supply of cheap oil. I see.

To: quehubo who wrote (93073)	11/3/2007 10:42:44 PM
From: t4texas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206117

quehubo, i don't think we will have to create safe passage or live without safe passage through the stait of hormuz either. that was not what i was attempting to convey. i was just stating that the strait is not so narrow, and if some shipping were temporarily to block the current shipping lanes, they would be opened up pretty quickly by other alternative strait of hormuz routes that i am absolutely positive have been studied and planned for years by the us navy and others too.