Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Truth About Islam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck who wrote (10770)	11/5/2007 4:59:16 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 20106

Britain's love affair w/ Saudi kingdom (tale of Saudi's Islamic theocracy's Oppressive brutality) telegraph ^ \| Nv. 04, 2007 \| Jemima Khan telegraph.co.uk King Abdullah arrived at Heathrow last Wednesday morning for the first State Visit to the UK for 20 years – five planes, 13 family members, an entourage of several hundred. No women. I've been to Saudi Arabia a few times. It's not much fun being a woman there. I suspect it's worse being a Saudi woman. And worse still being her migrant maid. It's a mad place and the rules there have got nothing to do with Islam. I've had my feet beaten, not once but twice – first by a stick-wielding crone at Mecca for not wearing socks, then by a pool attendant when I (swathed entirely in compulsory trick-or-treat black) took my son to the hotel pool for a paddle. I've heard old ladies complain that they are so harassed at night by the frustrated male youth of Jeddah that they have to take their scarves off and reveal their raddled faces just to scare them off. The irony of having to show your face to protect your modesty was entirely lost on them. I've also woken up mid-flight on the plane home from Jeddah to London and discovered that the passengers who embarked in full hijab have all been replaced by Bond Street babes. In Saudi Arabia, a woman can't travel abroad, leave the house or even be examined by a doctor without the express permission of her husband. She cannot be seen with any man except a close family member, the only exception being her chauffeur – and that's a necessity because legally she's not permitted to drive. She cannot marry a non-Muslim (or even a non-Sunni Muslim). And she cannot wear anything other than a long black cloak and headscarf in public. Although women account for 70 per cent of all graduates, they make up just 5 per cent of the workforce. If they contravene the strict laws, they risk public floggings or execution. A few years ago, 15 girls died in a school fire in Mecca because religious police ("The Commission for The Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice") prevented them from leaving the blazing school building as they were not wearing correct Islamic dress and there were no relatives outside to receive them. Apparently the police beat them as they tried to escape. Some would say the rules are as inexplicable (not to mention as unIslamic) as in Afghanistan under the Taliban, where a friend of mine – a Pakistani journalist – had his pubic hair measured at a check point (with a stick with duct tape on the end shoved into his shalwar) to see if it was cropped in accordance with religious custom. But the difference is that our government expressed outrage and bombed Afghanistan for their human rights abuses as well as for harbouring (mostly Saudi) terrorists. And, for good measure, we bombed Iraq too, at least in part for their human rights abuses and lack of democracy. King Abdullah, on the other hand – our Prime Minister's "friend" with whom, according to Foreign Office Minister Kim Howell, "we have many values in common" – gets a ceremonial welcome, a couple of banquets, breakfast with the Queen at Buckingham Palace and meetings with Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Prince Charles. The Prime Minister failed to bring up the subject of human rights or democracy. Or the fact that Saudi Arabia exports and sponsors an extreme and distorted form of Islam to the rest of the World. The madrassahs in Pakistan, which gave rise to the radicalism of the Taliban, have been funded by Saudi money since the Afghan jihad. And a hoard of malignant literature can be found inside as many as a quarter of Britain's mosques, published and distributed by agencies linked to the government of King Abdullah. These "education pamphlets" call for, amongst other measures, the beheading of Muslims who abandon Islam, attacks on homosexuals, religious segregation of society, for women to stay indoors and interfaith marriages to be banned. Nor did our PM mention the persecution of Shias, homosexuals, non-Muslims, the public floggings, the torture, the detentions without trial or the maltreatment of migrant workers. Nor the total lack of freedom of expression and information nor the ban on trade unions, political opposition and non-Muslim religions. Does our government really care about human rights and democracy? The message is, it's business as usual, everything forgiven, as long as you're a country which is pro-West, strategically important, oil rich and able to buy billions of pounds worth of our arms. There's nothing new about it. It's not even that surprising. In fact, our politicians can't even be bothered to offer an excuse.