SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChanceIs who wrote (94013)11/6/2007 6:06:36 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
>>establishing a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets

Great, so does that include Ditech or GMAC? Wonder how Cerebus is enjoying those "assets" right about now?



To: ChanceIs who wrote (94013)11/6/2007 6:13:59 PM
From: CalculatedRiskRespond to of 306849
 
$10B here, $10B there. It was starting to add up.

But $39B ... that is some real change!

biz.yahoo.com

"SFAS No. 109 guidelines require that a valuation allowance should now be established due to more recent events and developments during the 2007 third quarter. A significant negative factor was the company's three-year historical cumulative loss in the third quarter of 2007 in the U.S., Canada and Germany on an adjusted basis. Another significant factor was the ongoing weakness at GMAC Financial Services related to its Residential Capital, LLC (ResCap) mortgage business, including substantial U.S. losses incurred in 2007. Finally, the company faces more challenging near-term automotive market conditions in the U.S. and Germany."



To: ChanceIs who wrote (94013)11/6/2007 6:36:31 PM
From: PerspectiveRespond to of 306849
 
Any idea what scenarios would require *cash* influx from GM at this stage of the game? Noncash charges are nice, but cash outflows are the real deal. I've read repeatedly that they're off the hook for additional cash infusions for the Ditech sale, but I'm guessing that's just in terms of adjustments to the deal pricing. Is there a scenario that causes GM with its remaining minority stake to put up additional cash?

BC