SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Blank Check IPOs (SPACS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jrhana who wrote (1284)11/7/2007 7:05:39 AM
From: jrhana  Respond to of 3862
 
The ESA principals have been deluged with questions from impatient investors tired of trying to watch paint dry.

One of their executives has supposedly answered: "Everyone needs to relax, take a deep breath and sit down. Everything is going fine. There is not the hint of a problem anywhere. We're all going to make a lot of money."

Not very scientific but I believe it to be true.

The major question is whether you find Marshall Reynolds to be credible or not. Clearly I do.



To: jrhana who wrote (1284)11/7/2007 7:09:36 AM
From: TheSlowLane  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3862
 
Nice work, jrhana. I appreciate your efforts in sniffing out the details. So...by Thanksgiving? Christmas? Any guess?



To: jrhana who wrote (1284)12/12/2007 9:12:20 AM
From: jrhana  Respond to of 3862
 
There are reasons to think a profitable new domestic energy producer could do very well

biz.yahoo.com



To: jrhana who wrote (1284)1/21/2008 10:57:04 AM
From: jrhana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3862
 
These may prove to have some relevance to ESA

Message 24232906

Message 24233011

As we await Godot, Armageddon, and the ESA news release. Maybe they've be deliberately holding back to let the current market down draft stabilize.

<This was a planned, and very well orchestrated
final shakeout, just before massive Fed action
and a major stimulus package.>

Message 24232917

ESA has said they will release their news when they have it regardless of market conditions, but somehow it makes more sense to do it right after the Fed cuts by a point.