Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (52638)	11/9/2007 8:56:36 AM
From: Mr. Aloha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

Agree there's country risk for EPM, but that doesn't make it "garbage," especially with production imminent. Country risk hasn't stopped Kazakhmys from getting a market cap over $13 billion in London, and 2 years ago, when oil prices were much lower, the Chinese (CNPC) bought out PetroKazakhstan for over $4 billion. Some seek out Kasakhstan investments for the "Borat" trade: seekingalpha.com Yes, the new US legislation sure makes the risk of projects in other countries seem much less relatively. Projects directly to the south of there seem a much better risk to me, especially with the cheap labor costs, easier permitting, and lack of environmentalist activism. cuu.v -- Seemed like a NLW rec, but don't know for sure. mts.v -- Yes, this one could turn out to be a good one, though it's very early stage.