To: Frankly Speaking who wrote (52669 ) 11/10/2007 1:26:42 PM From: marcos Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78418 cpt.v - two loonies is where i got in originally, seven and a half years ago, lol ... just holding a small amount now, though it's not as small as it was last year, that's nice ... but still remembering vividly the 4.26 high, likely will find it difficult to refrain from taking profit there goz.v - not exactly speedy are they ... but i doubt they'll be distracted by the new property, Bjorkdal is pretty much a lock for production near term ... if wrong on that, then it's definitely time to be pissed ... but if you stand back and look at project advancement and the chart, they are actually making progress ... probably the chart is lagging development at this point, by a considerable margin maybe, if/when it catches up we'll be happier, and this event is not always directly and wholly attributable to management action/inaction ... not that we can't bitch - sure i think they should be producing now, if they'd learned to promote they could have raised money far higher, exercised option on B and be pouring gold regularly by this time ... but the value is there and will be recognised eventually, stock doubled this year, it'll do that at least next year even at their piddling pace, imho wkm.v - haven't dumped the ones outide rrsp accounts yet, think a little higher ... got a few into rrsp, not many so far ... no idea how long it stays at this level, it's a very low market cap for such a mine, but they haven't handled things well at all ckg.v - i have no common back yet, just warrants, would like more of them ... hard to get them sitting on the bid, it's one reason i'd like to see a wicked little gold dumpola come along ktn.v - there's a Lindsay? ... 'he' or 'she'? ... if she, does she give good phone? ... remember Sophie of wsp.v, ahhh ... labs are really backed up at this point, one reason i hear is that it's the peak of the seasonality in their business, there comes a slacker period soon, another reason is that many companies are sending in more core than originally planned mmg - got thoughts here but the first ones are not printable ... ok, working on the second through tenth - management didn't like nuisance phone calls stimulated by greenhorn players reading raw-data releases, so they decided not to release data ... ?? ... but what does this show us - maybe the big takeaway lesson is that they don't like nuisance phone calls - what if we took turns and called every hour on the hour inquiring as to why there is no silver data published? ... twenty-four/seven, oh yeah, we've got SIers in a wide variety of time zones ... anybody got Merlin's cell number?