Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (25052)	11/11/2007 11:00:42 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217802

ElM, I understand that you have in Brazil different ethics from NZ. Maoris had the same ethics. They would attack neighbouring tribes, enslave, kill and eat them. Peter Blake was invited into Brazil, he did not invade, he was there legally, as a guest, and the Brazilians killed him, shooting him in the back. I can understand that your ethics and morals think well of Islamic Jihad head-hacking too and that it's a giggle. <You,? You'll always face the Jihadists :-) I doubt they would have a use for your head (as an useful organ) if they'd chopped it off. LOL! > You must have thought it hilarious when Stan Shaw got his head hacked. That certainly showed those hard-working Kiwis what would happen to them. He made the mistake of building cellphone towers in Islamic-jihad land. Hmmm, I know somebody else who is doing that. ElM, I have never heard of anywhere which charges people for breathing air, let alone varies the charge depending on papers in pockets. <We don't ask for some dollars for the rights to breath the air above ones head based on a booklet one may carry in his pocket. > I advocate free air as a loss-leader, and charging for driving on roadways, entering hospitals, landing in airports, turning on taps, flicking electricity switches, yakking on cyberphones etc. Salt from the ocean would be free as would the water in it. If I was running India, everyone would be free to get all the salt they liked from the ocean. They would not need any resource consent to suck all the water they liked into enormous desalination plants. Mohandas Gandhi wouldn't have had to seek a licence. In your moral and ethical world, he'd get his head hacked for being an infidel. You would rate that a LOL. Weird, but that's what you claim. Your hypocrisy is also part of your moral and ethical way. If people move into your house to live, you will not accept that and you will resist. You would charge them rent for a room or call the constabulary to have them removed. Your refrigerator and cupboards full of food would not be available to them to avail themselves of anything they want. In my ethical and moral world, we wouldn't use hanging from a tree to deal with bottle breakers. That would make organ transplant difficult. We would process them in the facility in which the transfer would take place. However, I would not set up a facility depending on such a supply of organs as I suspect there would be few people willing to make donations. Getting people to break bottles would be difficult. Even leaving a whole lot of full beer bottles lying around in handy refrigerators would not see many thrown with gay abandon and a well positioned stone wall to make the job easy. Now, would you stop yakking and get back to work. I think you are spending too much time with those Islamic Jihad terrorist women you showed photos of, and mixing orange juice under the table too much too. QCOM profits were only up 84%. You are obviously not working hard enough. Mqurice