Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LoneClone who wrote (52700)	11/11/2007 12:44:37 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78414

ccu.to - 'Scenario 3: Using the LVC Project, the TCZ Project, and the SJC Project, assuming all three are producing at full capacity in 2009 (2009-2012+) 60 million pounds copper annually x .80 recovery (estimated) = 48 million pounds 48 M lbs. Cu x ($2.25 - $.65 cost (estimated) + $.09 premium) = $81.1 profit/year So, $81.1M + $84.6M (LVC Project) + $121M (TCZ Project) = $286.7 million/year x P/E of 10 = $2.87 billion $2.7 billion/169 million shares = $16.98/share' silverinscripture.com So that'll be a hunderd bagger for you, plus enough for a round of beer, not bad -g- .. scenario 117.1 however, has creditors taking the whole shebang for a dime on the dollar, so ya pays yer nickel and takes yer chances ... i'll likely add, not much though until we see what shakes out, who is going to end up with what But the above page, after Tom's mention, has fired me up, gonna go into business myself, find something that fits my new website, maybe get Peter Trower to help me write, check it out - woodindoggerel.bc.ca Saw this embroidered on a jean jacket yesterday - Spiritual people inspire me Religious people frighten me