Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (25080)	11/11/2007 9:52:27 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217789

Pointing out your false statements are false, isn't splitting hairs. We aren't an occupying power in Iraq, and we aren't a hair off of being so either. We are not subjugating Iraq or seeking to rule it. No hair splitting or subtle nuances involved in that statement. Also not that UN approval is directly relevant to the point, but see un.org In particular "“Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, “1. Notes that the presence of the multinational force in Iraq is at the request of the Government of Iraq and reaffirms the authorization for the multinational force as set forth in resolution 1546 (2004) and decides to extend the mandate of the multinational force as set forth in that resolution until 31 December 2007, taking into consideration the Iraqi Prime Minister’s letter dated 11 November 2006 and the United States Secretary of State’s letter dated 17 November 2006;"