Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (248391)	11/13/2007 3:09:19 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

BTW, I've read it wasn't the 2 bombs that made Japan surrender; it was Russia entering that war. BTW, I've read that Roosevelt attacked Pearl Harbor.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (248391)	11/13/2007 3:39:08 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

was a combo but left exaggerates the russian factor to justify FDR and Stalin which right attacks. Without the a-bomb we might still be fighting. Dont you remeember when you were a kid about 10 years post WW2, they were still finding emaciated japanese soldiers in caves who hadnt heard war was over. Some were still shooting at us. Everytime we think we are getting grief in wars today, we should remember the fanaticism of the japs and the efficiency of the krauts. And of course we werent PC back then so we could say what we wanted. What do you think germans and japanese would have done to an al quada threat. Bin baby would he history and so would most moslems who got in the crossfire.