Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Keith J who wrote (93499)	11/13/2007 6:27:50 PM
From: Tommaso	Respond to of 206093

If you keep on talking sense like that, Homeland Security will come after you.

To: Keith J who wrote (93499)	11/13/2007 10:05:06 PM
From: ChanceIs	Respond to of 206093

>>>4) could provide a dedicated source of funding for development and implementation of energy alternatives.<<< JD Rockefeller used to pour gasoline into the local creeks near his kerosene refineries in Pennsylvania and Ohio. After a while somebody figured out that the gasoline had some value, and that it was a good idea to not have the creeks catch fire every so often. Let the energy alternatives fund themselves. The market mechanism will have its way. Fix the local roads? Have a local gasoline tax. Sure that will work. Want to not break the roads?? Apply a mass-mile fee on the SUVs. Fix the federal raods?? Have a federal gasoline tax. No problem. I think we already do that. Gasoline tax into general revenues!?!?!?! Not if I am running the show.