SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3272)11/14/2007 9:06:58 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Obama should select someone like Patrick Fitzgerald to be the next Attorney General for entire United States...;-)



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3272)11/14/2007 9:30:22 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Obama's day at Google

weblogs.baltimoresun.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3272)11/14/2007 2:20:56 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire  Respond to of 149317
 
Romney could only be elected if Clinton gets the nod on the Dem side. Then it would be ABC..... anybody but clinton.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3272)11/14/2007 7:19:28 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Experts Praise Obama's Technology and Innovation Agenda

campaignsandelections.com

“Barack Obama's innovation and technology agenda will end the current oil-and-gas Administration's lack of leadership on the issues shaping our future. This is a 21st century agenda, one that was developed for the American people, not the powerful, entrenched interests in Washington, DC. Barack Obama is the one candidate for president who can create the change necessary for America to enjoy real prosperity in a global economy. An Obama administration will drive investment in our communications infrastructure, our human capital and ensure we have a competitive marketplace that benefits all Americans.” [Reed Hundt, Former Chairman, Federal Communications Commission (1993-1997)]

“Barack Obama’s technology plan is unique because it focuses first and foremost on empowering people to connect with each other and with government to solve problems. The plan recognizes that technology is not an end in itself, but a means to improve education and health care, create jobs and make America safer. No other candidate so fully embraces technology as a way to strengthen our democracy and improve people’s lives. The plan is truly innovative.” [William E. Kennard, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission (1997-2001); Managing Director, The Carlyle Group]

“Senator Obama has offered a broad range of initiatives to help America recover from the destructive effects of the last seven years, and I'm happy to support all of them. I'm particularly happy to see his strong but balanced proposal for "network neutrality" legislation, which, with minimum regulation, would help to reestablish and assure a competitive platform for innovation. More interesting to me, however, is the Senator's plan for opening government up. His proposal is not just that data about our government be available. It is instead that data be made available in a form and manner that social and political innovators can use to develop new tools to hold our government accountable. Think RSS or Atom applied to the full range of data we need to measure integrity and honesty in government. The great work of groups such as Sunlight and Maplight has obviously been an inspiration for Senator Obama's program. And recognition of the potential from this relatively subtle change is a signal that Obama gets how technology can matter, both to growing the economy, and shrinking corruption within government.” [ Lawrence Lessig, Professor of Law, Stanford University]

“Senator Obama's plan would help make sure that the Internet remains a free and open platform, and that America maintains an atmosphere of high-tech growth and innovation. We particularly share his aims of getting more Americans online, using the Internet to increase government transparency, and applying high-tech know how to thorny problems like education and health care. As the 2008 campaign unfolds, we hope that more candidates on both sides of the aisle will present their concrete ideas for maintaining America's competitive edge.” [Eric Schmidt, Chairman and CEO, Google, Inc.]

“Barack Obama realizes the pivotal role that technology plays in the 21st century. His plan is comprehensive and progressive. The Senator has taken a clear stand on difficult issues to ensure that Americans get the best of what technology can offer while protecting us from some all too real dangers. Obama recognizes, now more than ever, that technology can and must be harnessed to improve our government, our economy, and people's lives. As President, Barack Obama’s approach to technology will be indicative of his overall smart, practical, and optimistic vision for America.” [Jonathan Miller, Former Chairman and CEO, America Online, Inc.]

“Senator Obama's proposal to open up government decision-making represents a powerful commitment to democracy. I am proud to support it. Barack Obama recognizes that we can use new technology to make government more transparent. But he would also ensure that citizens have the right and ability to make use of information from their government to empower themselves. He calls for citizen engagement in the work of federal agencies and thereby demonstrates his deep commitment to democracy and his respect for the intelligence and expertise of the American people. Alone among the candidates, Barack Obama understands that the time, expertise and enthusiasm that people invest in making Wikipedia better, for example, can be transformed into practices to make government work better. And Barack Obama understands that new technology, including blogs, wikis and social networking tools, can be brought to bear to modernize government, improve decision-making and deepen democracy in the digital age. The ideas set forth in the Obama plan make this the right plan for American Democracy.” [Beth Noveck, Professor of Law, New York Law School]

“Barack Obama understands the power of technological innovation to revitalize American society. His unequivocal support for the policy of network neutrality will keep the Internet truly open. The creation and appointment of a national Chief Technology Officer will foster a much needed increase in the transparency of government and the re-democratization of governing processes to include all Americans. Importantly, he will also take steps to ensure America's economic competitiveness, including a much-needed reform of the patent system.” [Mitch Kapor, President, Kapor Enterprises; Founder, Lotus Development Corporation]

“Sen. Obama's Innovation and Technology Policy is both innovative and far reaching. As someone who works with emerging growth companies on a day to day basis in the health care and clean technology areas, I am particularly impressed by his commitment to supporting the use of technology in these critical areas.” [John Roos, CEO, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati]

“Barack Obama 'gets' technology. He will be a true 21st century President, using technology to improve the lives of all Americans. Barack Obama understands the powerful role that technology must play in solving our most pressing problems like energy, climate change, health care & education. He understands that we need a strong, competitive and constantly innovating technology industry to create jobs and drive economic growth. He understands that technology is an essential tool to open up government to citizens and improve government functioning dramatically. The Obama campaign is making history in its use of technology to connect with ordinary citizens. An Obama administration will make smart and aggressive use of our country's technology expertise, one of our most unique and important resources.” [Julius Genachowski, Co-Founder & Managing Director, Rock Creek Ventures; former Chief of Business Operations & General Counsel, IAC/InterActiveCorp; former Chief Counsel to FCC Chairman Reed Hundt]

“Barack Obama's Technology and Innovation plan is by far the most comprehensive roadmap of all the Presidential candidates for how digital technology and broadband networks can transform our society. Senator Obama understands the importance of an open, nondiscriminatory and universally accessible broadband Internet and balanced copyright and patent laws to robust civic discourse, innovation, creativity and competition. He also understands the importance technology plays in solving the most vexing problems our country faces: low cost health care, energy independence, cleaning up the environment, global competitiveness, providing a quality education for our children, and fortifying our first responders through modern public safety networks. Technology and innovation issues have been virtually ignored, and often politicized over the past eight years - today, more than ever, we need a President for the digital age. With this plan, Barack Obama demonstrates that he is the best candidate for the job.” [Gigi Sohn, President and Co-Founder, Public Knowledge]

"Net neutrality will continue the twentieth-century tradition of competition policy in telecommunications and bring it into the twenty-first century. There are sensible arguments on both sides, but on balance I believe thoughtful enforcement of net neutrality will be a winner by protecting opportunities for web-based innovators to succeed without having to build a relationship with a cable or phone company. I also agree with Senator Obama’s statement that strong antitrust enforcement makes capitalism work for consumers. It’s important to strengthen consumer protection against anticompetitive mergers and monopolization.” [Joseph Farrell, Professor of Economics at the University of California, Berkeley; Chief Economist at the Federal Communications Commission (1996-97); Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Economics (chief economist), Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice (2000-2001)]

“I was lucky enough to work for Vice President Gore, one of the few politicians of our generation who was not afraid of technology, but rather embraced technology for its power to transform our government and our nation. With this plan, Barack Obama shows that he too has the vision and a plan to harness the power of technology to make America a more open and equal society and once again a leader in innovation around the world.” [Don Gips; Executive Vice President, Corporate Development, Level 3 Communications; Former Chief Domestic Policy Advisor to Vice President Gore]

“Senator Obama has a vision to take the application of technology in our country to new levels. He believes that the thoughtful application of technology can address challenges such as government transparency, healthcare management and efficiency, energy independence, and universal broadband access. Senator Obama also has the ability to recognize opportunity where others do not. He understands that technology can be used to address some of today's most pressing issues, such as creating sustainable jobs, providing competitive wages, and leveraging the distinctive talents of the American people irrespective of where they live. Senator Obama's vision for technology is transformative and will lead to sustainable economic development – and this is why I support his campaign.” [Robert Blackwell; President, Electronic Knowledge Interchange]

“ America’s youth are growing up in an increasingly connected global economy. Barack Obama’s innovation plan will ensure that this generation of young people can compete and succeed as they enter the workforce. Senator Obama understands the power of information and connectedness in the 21st century to create opportunity, make government open and accessible, and bring people together.” [Alec Ross, Co-Founder and Executive Vice President, One Economy]

“Barack Obama’s plan takes our country’s strong technology leadership in the private sector and brings it to the public sector in a number of important ways. Significant investment in our communications infrastructure is vital both to broaden access for broadband and to foster investment in the next generation of products and services that depend on it. Upgrading the quality of our educational system particularly around math and science is the best way to not only insure continued US competitiveness but also to make sure that future job growth happens in America rather than overseas. At the same time comprehensive immigration reform is essential to make sure that we continue to be a magnet for the best talent from around the world and provide them a path to become Americans over time. Obama’s plan accomplishes all of this and much more.” [Deven J. Parekh, Managing Director, Insight Venture Partners]

“Among the little attended but most astounding failures of the Bush administration is the absence of a comprehensive national broadband strategy. Instead, we have been given unrealistic goals, ‘mission accomplished’ rhetoric, and federal policy that has supported entrenched incumbency over competition and innovation. The Obama plan presents a bold prescription for an open Internet to put America back on top of the world in communications technology. This is a blueprint to bring the United States universal, affordable access to next generation telecommunications, overlaying competition policy on the public airwaves and our network infrastructure to revolutionize the online marketplace of ideas and commerce.” [Ben Scott, Policy Director, Free Press]

“In his technology plan, Barack Obama shows not only that he gets the power of the Internet as a means of transforming politics—which the very conduct of his campaign proves—but that he also appreciates how the Internet is transforming our economy and society. From his policy commitments to spurring the availability of broadband throughout the U.S. to unleashing opportunities to make wireless spectrum more available to chartering a Public Media 2.0 for the digital age to ensuring that the U.S. government commits to the levels of transparency and participation that the Internet makes possible, Obama's plan provides an ambitious, creative, and thoughtful roadmap for his administration.” [Phil Weiser, Professor of Law and Telecommunications, University of Colorado]



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3272)11/15/2007 3:38:10 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Googlers Quiz Obama at Town Hall: The Videos - November 14, 2007

Real Leadership on Technology

youtube.com

Q and A from Google employees pt. I

youtube.com

Q and A from Google employees pt. II

youtube.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3272)11/15/2007 3:09:36 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
ANOTHER PART OF THE BUSH LEGACY IN QUESTION? Party-building success through the lens of history

By Rhodes Cook
Senior Columnist

During his first term, George W. Bush was arguably the most successful party-building president since Franklin D. Roosevelt. Like FDR, who fashioned a Democratic coalition that dominated American politics for a generation, Bush during his first four years in office helped the Republicans post gains in Congress and around the country that many in the party viewed as the cornerstone for a similarly long-lived GOP majority.

But during his seemingly ill-starred second term, the Republicans have hemorrhaged seats up and down the ballot--losing their majorities in both houses of Congress, dropping hundreds of seats in the state legislatures, and giving up enough governorships to leave the GOP with less than half of them for the first time in more than a decade.

As a result, with barely a year to go in his administration, that part of Bush's legacy--as a party builder par excellence--remains very much in question.

Over the course of his presidency, Bush has thrown himself into the role of party builder with gusto that few, if any, of his predecessors have matched. He has helped the GOP and its candidates raise tens of millions of dollars and he has stumped extensively for Republican candidates who tapped the White House for assistance.

Boosted by high approval ratings through much of his first term and with the Democrats on the defensive, Bush's efforts to help his party initially paid off. In 2002, he became the first president since FDR in 1934 to see his party gain both House and Senate seats in his first midterm election.

In 2004, Republicans added more seats to their congressional majorities with Bush leading the GOP ticket. The Republican Senate total swelled to 55 seats and the GOP House total to 232, the highest post-election total for the party on the House side in nearly 60 years and equaling the GOP's highest post-election total on the Senate side since the eve of the Great Depression in the late 1920s. A nation split 50-50 after the 2000 election looked after 2004 as though it was definitely leaning Republican.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 1. GOP Builds Congressional Numbers in Bush's First Term, Loses Ground in Second
Republicans steadily gained seats in both houses of Congress during President Bush's first term, as well as maintaining a clear majority of the nation's governorships. But since then, the GOP has been shedding seats at all levels. Recent Republican losses have paralleled a steady decline in the job approval ratings of Bush and the GOP Congress, which lost support at a rate of 10 to 15 percentage points in two-year intervals from 2002 to 2006. Numbers in bold indicate that the president's party was in control of the chamber or held a majority of governorships.

2000 2002 2004 2006
Republican Seats (post election)
SENATE 50 51 55 49
HOUSE 221 229 232 202
GOVERNOR 29 26 28 22
Approval Ratings (election eve)
PRESIDENT BUSH - 63% 48% 38%
CONGRESS 49% 50% 40% 26%

Sources: America Votes (CQ Press), Gallup Poll.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But Bush's second term has thus far been an unmitigated disappointment for both the White House and the Republican Party. Led by growing voter frustration with the ongoing war in Iraq and a GOP Congress that was widely seen as a rubber stamp for the president, voter approval for both declined quickly in Bush's second term. Presidential approval scores that hovered around 50 percent in 2004 had fallen under 40 percent by the time of the 2006 midterm elections, and congressional approval scores that had been around 40 percent in 2004 Gallup surveys had plummeted into the mid-20s at the time of last year's Democratic comeback.

Yet the Republican setbacks of late are no disaster when viewed in historical terms. It has been the norm for two-term presidents to lose House and Senate seats over the course of their administrations. And the size of the Republicans' falloff in Congress since Bush's election in 2000--19 House seats and one Senate seat--is actually on the low side when compared to the drop suffered by parties of other two-term presidents at a comparable point in their second terms.

By the seven-year mark, Bill Clinton's Democrats had lost nearly 50 House seats from his initial election in 1992, Dwight D. Eisenhower's Republicans had plummeted nearly 70 seats, and Woodrow Wilson's Democrats had lost close to 100 House seats. On the Senate side, the Republican net loss of one seat during the Bush years has also been on the low end for two-term presidents. The result is that the Republicans are not so far down in the House or the Senate that they could not pick up at least one house of Congress in 2008 should the issues agenda shift in their direction.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 2. A Decline in Congressional Allies the Norm for Two-Term Presidents
The Republicans have lost a net of 19 House seats and one Senate seat since George W. Bush was elected president in 2000, and in the process lost control of both houses of Congress. But compared to other two-term presidents over the past century, the GOP's numerical losses have not been so bad. Most other presidents in a similar position have passed the midpoint of their second term with their party having suffered much greater losses in both the House and the Senate. Numbers in bold indicate that the president's party was in control of the chamber.

Seats Held by the President's Party

HOUSE SENATE
President Party Elections Start 6th-Year Election Change Start 6th-Year Election Change
Woodrow Wilson D 1912-18 290 191 -99 51 47 -4
W. Harding/C. Coolidge R 1920-26 300 237 -63 59 48 -11
Franklin Roosevelt D 1932-38 313 262 -51 59 69 +10
F. Roosevelt/H. Truman D 1944-50 243 234 -9 57 48 -9
Dwight Eisenhower R 1952-58 221 154 -67 48 34 -14
J. Kennedy/L. Johnson D 1960-66 263 248 -15 64 64 0
R. Nixon/G. Ford R 1968-74 192 144 -48 42 38 -4
Ronald Reagan R 1980-86 192 177 -15 53 45 -8
Bill Clinton D 1992-98 258 211 -47 57 45 -12
George W. Bush R 2000-06 221 202 -19 50 49 -1

Source: Vital Statistics on American Politics 2005-2006.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In short, the final verdict on President Bush as a party builder is yet to be delivered. While talk of a Republican majority has been muted, he continues to raise lots of money for the GOP and its candidates and remains popular with the party base.

To be sure, his overall job approval rating barely tops 30 percent these days. But that is still a few points higher than the score that voters give the Democratic-controlled Congress. Their approval rating in late 2007 is not much higher than the 23 percent score given the Democratic Congress in the Gallup Poll on the eve of the party's titanic wipeout in 1994. And in the 2008 presidential trial heats between Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton and GOP front-runner Rudy Giuliani, the Republicans are quite competitive. The lead has gone back and forth between the two over the course of 2007 with neither pulling very far ahead of the other.

What may be most ominous for Republican presidential prospects next year is the voters' willingness (if not eagerness) in the last half century to say no to the party in power after two terms, and turn the keys to the Oval Office over to their rivals. Only once since 1952 has a party garnered the electoral votes needed to win three consecutive presidential elections--that being in 1988 when George H.W. Bush won what many have called Ronald Reagan's "third term."

The four other times since 1952 that a third consecutive term for one party was a possibility, the voters turned thumbs down, although each time the vote was close--1960, 1968, 1976, and most recently, the controversial, drawn-out election of 2000--which brought down the curtain on the presidency of Clinton I and raised it on Bush II.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 3. Bush and Truman: Lowest Presidential Approval Scores at the 7-Year Mark
George W. Bush arrives near the end of his 7th year in office with the lowest job approval rating of any incumbent at a similar stage of his presidency since Harry Truman in late 1951. The Gallup Poll, which is used here, began measuring presidential approval in the 1930s. Since then, eight presidents have served two full terms, finished the second term of their predecessor, or finished a first term (or in Truman's case, a fourth) and been elected to another. Those who assumed office after the death or resignation of their predecessor are indicated by a pound sign (#).

President Party Gallup Poll Date Approval Rating President's Party in Next Presidental Election (popular vote margin)
President's with Majority Approval
Dwight Eisenhower R Oct. 1959 67% Lost by 0.2%
Franklin Roosevelt D Oct. 1939 63% WON by 10%
Bill Clinton D Oct. 1999 59% Won by 0.5%, lost electoral vote
Ronald Reagan R Oct. 1987 51% WON by 8%
Presidents with Less than Majority Approval
Gerald Ford# R Oct.-Nov. 1975 44% Lost by 2%
Lyndon Johnson# D Oct.-Nov. 1967 41% Lost by 0.7%
George W. Bush R Nov. 2007 31% -
Harry Truman# D Oct. 1951 29% Lost by 11%

Source: Gallup Poll.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3272)11/15/2007 6:52:05 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Obama is 'Google-like'

news.com