SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (228031)11/14/2007 12:06:46 PM
From: Oral Roberts  Respond to of 793955
 
I can easily live with your rough rules. It's not always adhered to though.

This discussion just can't be had because the fringes control the conversation. I think a vast majority don't like it but aren't in favor of outlawing it other then 3rd trimester. But the conversation is controlled by the folks who either think there is no acceptable reason to have one and the other side who think until the moment of natural birth it should be allowed. Most of us aren't even part of the conversation in other words IMO.

And if Rudy gets the nomination I expect a lot more screaming to be going with this issue.



To: LindyBill who wrote (228031)11/14/2007 2:58:34 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793955
 
The rough rule keeps changing as they keep saving earlier and earlier premies. Now they routinely save babies as early as 24 weeks. That's still in second trimester.