Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (358826)	11/16/2007 1:24:25 PM
From: SilentZ	Respond to of 1573429

>No, that also includes the rich who know how to legally avoid taxes. Arianna Huffington is my favorite example. I'm certainly up for making it more difficult to avoid taxes. >They are already progressive, and yet the rich continue to get richer. They got significantly less progressive under Clinton, and the gap did not grow as quickly. >You can blame Bush all you want, but the gap also grew under Clinton. Absolutely. I'd vote for Clinton over Bush, but the Clintons are not true progressives and are bought and sold by corporations -- just not to the same extent the Republican party is. And I'm not voting for Hillary in the primary. But if you were to ask most of the conservatives here, they'd tell you Hillary is a socialist. That's far from the case. -Z