Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ruffian who wrote (248642)	11/16/2007 3:07:10 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

You are wrong as usual. It appears, Ruffian, that you chose your handle of 'ruffian' to personify the dictionary idea: 1. a tough, lawless person; roughneck; bully. In order to accomplish that, I can see how it would be necessary to take everything personally and attempt to make things personal for everyone else, paired with rude and abusive conduct. Feel free but such behavior also forces you to compromise principle and sacrifice personal decency to push things to extremisms, resulting in your being bluntly and crudely wrong about most of these discussion topics, with no redeeming qualities. Nothing personal here, just the facts. For what its worth, I disagree with the dictionary on this definition. I don't consider bullies to be tough. I consider you all to be cowardly thugs, desperately striking out at others in an attempt to quell your feelings of your self hate and fear. Best regards, gem