Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandintoes who wrote (154711)	11/19/2007 8:46:19 AM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 225578

Here's my point I don't think anyone has the answer. If I'm going to dismiss respected scientists I'm certainly going to dismiss an engineer. Things ARE changing - is this natural, man made or a combination? Chances are its a little of both. I'm guessing it's both but I DON'T KNOW! Thats the whole crux of this issue for me. I don't know and neither does Al Gore or Rush Limbaugh. Instead of quietly going about research we've opted to make this a political event so know all logic is out the window. Regardless of global warming we need to find an alternative fuel source (and that will include Nuclear even though I hate it) that burns cleaner and is plentiful. We need this because we have to reduce our need for oil AND the side benefit of environmentally friendly is great! What we can't do is go broke by funding a hypothesis. I don't recall the fuel additive that we used in the 90's but it was going to result in a cleaner burn. We did a few tests, poured money into it and put it on the market. Well guess what? The offshoot is now laying at the bottom of our lakes in the southwest.