Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: loantech who wrote (53118)	11/19/2007 2:58:23 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78413

Well hurry back man, you know how i hate responsibility, and you're better at it anyway The whole issue of how-many-shares-out in absolute numbers seems to have shifted to more of a british style, where they trade quite large successful companies in a few pence per share, and consider only total market cap in valuation, there is no stigma to a 'low' per-share price ... and that's probably more rational, still we'll have degrees of prejudice against 'high' floats here for a long time yet, i know i have lots of it, very much prefer a lower f.d. number just for itself Both epm.to and wgi/wgw got all those shares out because they ran into problems years ago on the way to their current successes ... so it goes ... and it's likely a good part of what keeps them cheap, relative to their earnings prospects ccu.to - here's one that looks like it's about to have a whole lot more shares out, on its way to such success and earnings as it may eventually enjoy, under whichever management and ownership it enjoys when it gets there ... have you looked at ccu, Claude? ... be a great idea at a dime or so eh, if it worked