Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (17531)	11/20/2007 6:07:20 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

Cato will never be taken seriously on science until they are honest about what they are discussing: Economics or science or liberty. When will you be honest about what Pelosi, Gore and the UN ultimately after?

To: neolib who wrote (17531)	11/20/2007 6:26:16 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

You can argue its bad science but it was about science. It was about ice melting and historical temperatures not costs of policies to limit CO2 emissions. It would have been fine if it was about the later, because that certainly is a serious concern, but it wasn't about that. As for 2nd hand smoke being junk science, well it depends on what claims about it your talking about. The idea that it poses some additional level of risk to people who are frequently around smokers isn't junk science, even if it isn't as well qualified as people who push the idea hard might claim. OTOH those who claim that any level of exposure however mild or short term is a serious health risk are indeed promoting junk science. See reason.com