SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION THE FIGHT TO KEEP OUR DEMOCRACY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (2672)11/21/2007 11:50:49 AM
From: Carolyn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3197
 
A Franklin County, MO, apple company was fined $599K

Apple company admits to illegal workers
By Robert Patrick
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
11/21/2007

A Franklin County apple company on Tuesday pleaded guilty to a criminal immigration charge and agreed to pay $599,000 to settle federal charges that they had employed dozens of illegal aliens for more than five years.

Lochirco Fruit and Produce, Inc., which does business as Happy Apples, admitted employing illegal workers between 2001 and Oct. 19, 2006, when federal agents raided the property and detained 33 immigrant workers.

The company grows apples and sells apples, apple cider and caramel apples and has locations or facilities in or near Washington, Marthasville and Union, Mo.

Their caramel apples can be found in local and national supermarkets. Advertisement

As part of the plea agreement, Happy Apples and officer Joette Reidy admitted to a "pattern and practice" of "knowingly and intentionally" hiring unauthorized alien workers.

Reidy, who pleaded guilty to one felony count of hiring illegal alundocumented workers between Oct. 19, 2005 and Oct. 19, 2006.

Reidy, 40, is the daughter of one of the owners and will likely receive probation when sentenced next year. Her husband, Ed Reidy, 42, represented the company in court. The Reidys live in Washington.

Happy Apples, which pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of hiring illegal aliens, will have to pay a $99,000 fine and forfeit $500,000. "Obviously, you can't put a company in jail," U.S. District Judge Stephen Limbaugh said in court.

Federal prosecutors were unaware of a higher fine and forfeiture total in an immigration case here.

After the hearing, Joette Reidy's lawyer, Paul D'Agrosa and company lawyer Richard Sindel said that the workers were treated well, paid more than the minimum wage and housed in company lodging.

Even after the employees were detained by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement pending removal, the company made sure they were paid, Sindel said.

D'Agrosa said that Happy Apples did not start out hiring illegals, but was unable to hire American workers who were willing and reliable.

"We are sometimes forced to do things because of the realities on the ground. American workers don't want these jobs," D'Agrosa said. "These are the realities for agricultural businesses — all over the country."

But Assistant U.S. Attorney John Ware said that when federal agents searched the property, they found at least 40 employment applications that had been filled out by Americans.

They also found 33 illegal immigrants working the day shift alone. Those workers have been removed from the country or will be removed, Ware said.

Ware said Happy Apples may have been able to find American workers, just not ones willing to work the 12, 14, even 16-hour days worked by the illegal aliens.

The company is now participating in an approved Labor Department program, Ware said.

Ware said the pay varied by job, but said it was roughly $6 or $7 an hour, with $1 per hour bonus if the worker stayed the season, and said workers were not treated poorly.

Illegal workers have increasingly become an issue on the state and national level, as some frustrated state officials take their own measures to crack down on employers.

ICE agents first learned of Happy Apples, however, when the Franklin County Narcotics Enforcement Unit raided a Happy Apples house during a drug investigation and found 15 illegal immigrants. Five said they worked for Happy Apples, Sgt. Jason Grellner said. Grellner said many of the residents had fake IDs good enough to fool local police.

An confidential informer then called Joette Reidy and asked for work, telling her he didn't have "papers," court documents show. She referred him to her secretary, who said she could get him papers for $150 and that he could live in a Happy Apples house while he worked.

Some Marthasville residents said Tuesday night they don't ask about immigration status when they're talking to people on the street, but the raid did not come as a surprise given the number of Spanish-speaking workers in the area.

"Who else are you going to get for what they are paying them? They're not going to get someone from around here to do it," said Marthasville resident Ed Dickinson Tuesday night, speaking near one of the Happy Apples worker residences.

Greg Jonsson of the Post-Dispatch staff contributed to this story.

rpatrick@post-dispatch.com | 314-621-5154



To: John Carragher who wrote (2672)11/21/2007 5:38:50 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3197
 
Nation fade>Netherlands Not So Dutch Anymore

By MIKE CORDER,Associated Press Writer AP

- Thursday, November 22THE HAGUE, Netherlands
- One was a Somali refugee, the other an Argentine investment banker. Both are now high-profile Dutch women challenging this country to rethink its national identity.

Princess Maxima, the Argentine-born wife of Crown Prince Willem Alexander, triggered a round of national soul-searching with a speech last month about what exactly it means to be Dutch in an age of mass migration.

"The Netherlands is too complex to sum up in one cliche," she said. "A typical Dutch person doesn't exist."

Her comments have tapped into an unsettled feeling among many Dutch who fear traditional values have been eroded in a country roiled by a rise in Muslim extremism. It's a view espoused by Somali-born Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who has turned her back on her Islamic roots.

Conservatives in this nation of 16 million say the long Dutch tradition of welcoming immigrants and putting little or no pressure on them to integrate undermines Western values.

"Unfortunately, the debate about Dutch identity is too often held at a very trite and trivial level _ as if the discussion is between Brussels sprouts and wooden shoes on the one hand, and couscous and caftans on the other," said Bart Jan Spruyt, founder of The Edmund Burke Foundation, a conservative think tank.

"What is really at stake, due to a frivolous immigration policies and decades of multicultural indifference, is the identity of the Dutch nation, Dutch history and culture as a part of the history of Western civilization."

Han van der Horst, author of a popular book on Dutch culture and history, staunchly defends the nation's live-and-let-live traditions. He points to an old Dutch saying that translates as "everybody is entitled to his own views," but hastens to add: "It doesn't mean you respect those views or share" them.

That attitude historically allowed rigidly separated groupings known as "pillars" to form in society, meaning people of different faiths or political persuasion had their own churches, schools, newspapers, television and radio broadcasters and labor unions.

The system began to unravel in the 1960s, but some observers see the rise of Islam as a new pillar in Dutch society _ mosques are springing up around the country and Muslims have their own schools and Web sites.

Hirsi Ali, the former Somali refugee, is one of the success stories of Dutch immigration policy, but also one of its fiercest critics. She condemns the Dutch tradition of multiculturalism, saying tolerance for the intolerant has provided a dangerous breeding ground for Islamic radicalism.

Fear of such radicalism crystallized after the 2004 murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh, Hirsi Ali's collaborator on the controversial movie "Submission" _ a fictional study of abused Muslim women with scenes of near-naked women with Quranic texts engraved on their flesh.

Van Gogh's assailant shot the filmmaker and slit his throat on an Amsterdam street, leaving a letter pinned to his chest threatening the life of Hirsi Ali, who wrote the film's screenplay. Despite going into hiding with 24-hour police protection, Hirsi Ali continued to speak out.

"Our migration policy is a failure," she told The Associated Press in an interview last year. "We used to pretend that we were a homogenous little country and that Holland is not a migration country. We have become a migration country like the United States."

After she arrived in the Netherlands as an asylum seeker fleeing an arranged marriage, Hirsi Ali quickly mastered the Dutch language, found a job and then went to university to earn a degree, eventually becoming a lawmaker for the conservative Liberal Party.

She moved to the United States last year to take a job with a conservative think tank in Washington, but returned home this month after the Dutch government said it would not pay for round-the-clock protection in America.

Since the Van Gogh slaying, the conservative government has reversed course on multiculturalism, passing a raft of laws that emphasize integration over cultural tolerance _ most notably forcing foreigners to take citizenship courses and learn Dutch.

It's within that context that Princess Maxima's speech created such a stir, especially because the Dutch monarchy is not usually political.

Dutch lawmakers from all sides of the political spectrum also have weighed in. Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende _ one of three government ministers who approved the princess' speech before she delivered it _ supported her views. Right-wing, anti-Islam lawmaker Geert Wilders labeled it politically correct "tittle-tattle."<