SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (249172)11/21/2007 12:46:25 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Can we impeach now?



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (249172)11/21/2007 12:49:50 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Leaking plames name got us into war? I think the name was made public after war began, no?
"insignificant dalliance" A president getting a blow child from a child in the white house is insignificant. I know i stretched it because she was what 14 months older than what would have been deemed statutory rape if i got my ages right. In any case, if you have daughter, you wouldnt think a grown man using his power to compromise her was insignficant. And furthermore lying is lying so they all should go to hell in my opinion.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (249172)11/21/2007 1:00:23 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Clinton at least had the balls to lie to us in person. Bush shoved dog-loyal Scott McClellan out there to do it.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (249172)11/21/2007 1:09:43 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
lol rational of a LIB............