SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: nspolar who wrote (8452)11/22/2007 1:41:20 AM
From: nspolar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
This chart is ugly beyond ugly.

The blue lines indicate connection points of existing fibonnaci patterns.

The red lines indicate possible future connection points to a possible fibonnaci retracement, in mid 2012.

These types of patterns do in fact form. I am not trying to suggest at this point that this pattern will in fact form, only it is 'there'. If it in fact 'does' form, there is more than a run of the mill recession coming our way, and Ben will in fact literally drop money out of helicopters.



TF Tuco




To: nspolar who wrote (8452)12/11/2007 2:46:25 PM
From: nspolar  Respond to of 33421
 
The 30 yr yield chart .... Gross says Fed funds down to 3 %. What does that make the 30 Yr?

news.yahoo.com

This is the last down leg in the 30 Yr imo, but it may stretch out for a few more years at least. Time will show.

Afa market tops ... too early to call. A possibility but so far the markets have imo continued to show resilience. The next 6 weeks will be interesting.

A nice ding today, but a day is only a ding.

A question for the historians and market technicians (well the fundamentalists can get thrown in too).

Assuming LT rates continue to fall, the bond price will continue up (which I like as my work 401K is currently in bonds).

The question is this, "Is it more or less likely for a Big Top to occur coincident with a top in LT bond price?", or preceed it, or what?