Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ogi who wrote (53460)	11/26/2007 10:13:24 PM
From: loantech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78408

Buy WGW and sleep at night like I do. LOL.

To: ogi who wrote (53460)	11/27/2007 12:25:51 AM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78408

Oh seriously, well that's ridiculous ... or criminal, to just make stuff up - do you think enough people believed in 140m lengths to move the stock, from the typing of idiots on stockhouse? ... i rarely go there, been to a few threads recently, never thought to check the gqc one ... but it was quite active about august or september, this worried me a bit at the time, didn't see any outright fabrications just a lot of people not knowing much about mineral plays and with vague hopes ... 'market sentiment', as you say ... i've done a little trading but am reluctant to take cap gains before year end, probably would have offed some this morning anyway if real life had left me time to pay attention [and definitely would have if aware of your theory above] Goldquest has a lot more than one great property, the big deal i was in for originally was the properties under JV with Gold Fields, they hold shares in gqc [along with Barrick] and have been cooperating all the way through ... over five years now gqc has been plugging away in the DR, done all sorts of groundwork to build the portfolio they now hold ... i was in early, so it's all gains now, but they're good people, and deserve a lot better than to be used as a vehicle for sleazy little crims on stockhouse Some threads over there are not like that at all ... mlm.v for instance, had several posters who know their stuff thoroughly and would blow right out of the water any greaseballs like that showing up ... fwr.v was another, months ago ... read some of the ccu.to thread recently, it was mixed, some useful info ... but so much there is such crap, and the pages load so slow, that mostly it's not worth the time