Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.hinton who wrote (249718)	11/27/2007 2:50:40 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

PS if nadine is so sure arabs will reject it she sould embrace your plan with all her heart..... Good idea except for one large downside: anything any Israeli minister even suggests that Israel might give up is taken as already given away (& therefore a concession without value) when the talks start up again. Now they are demanding everything laid down at Taba as just the starting point. This is why half of Israel refers to the 'peace process' as the 'piece by piece process'.

To: c.hinton who wrote (249718)	11/27/2007 9:23:53 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Maurice had a good plan for the refugees. Wait 10 years and let the five survivors return. I can live with that. I want my ancestoral home back in poland which was confiscated by the nazis and/or soviets.. Arabs should have thought of the consequences of their actions when they violated the UN decision and attacked israel. By the way, you check the ownership history of your tuscany villa. Perhaps mussolini or the nazis stole your house from a jew or a gypsy.. If thats the case, give it back CH. Fact that you might have lived there for 60 years shouldnt mean a damn thing.