SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stephen O who wrote (12475)11/28/2007 11:36:01 AM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37187
 
VANCOUVER/CKNW(AM980) - Despite being given a show of
support by Vancouver 2010 organizers, embattled music
manager and CKNW editorialist, Bruce Allen is not out
of hot water just yet as the fallout continues from
his recent commentary indicating immigrants to Canada
should "fit in," or "go home."

Richmond Liberal MP, Raymond Chan, is set to file an
official complaint with the CRTC (Cdn Radio Television
Commission) about Allen's recent "reality check"
alleging the piece was discriminatory.

Chan is also demanding an official apology and a
retraction of the comments.

It's time we all get behind Bruce Allen, and scrap
this Political Correctness crap. His comments were
anything but racist, but there are far too many
overly-sensitive "New Canadians" that are trying to
change everything we hold dear.

For example, our National Anthem:
Don't know what your opinions are, but I certainly
agree. ---
I am sorry, but after hearing they want to sing the
National Anthem in Hindi - enough is enough. No where
or at no other time in our nation's history, did they
sing it in Italian, Japanese, Polish, Irish (Celtic),
German, Portuguese, Greek, or any other language
because of immigration. It was written in English, and
should be sung word for word the way it was written.
The news broadcasts even gave the translation -- not
even close.

I am not sorry if this offends anyone, this is MY
COUNTRY - IF IT IS YOUR COUNTRY SPEAK UP ---- please
pass this along~
I am not against immigration -- just come through like
everyone else.
Get a sponsor; have a place to lay your head; have a
job; pay your taxes, live by the rules AND LEARN THE
LANGUAGE as all other immigrants have in the past --
and LONG LIVE CANADA!

PART OF THE PROBLEM. Think about this: If you don't
want to forward this for fear of offending
someone-----YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM !!!!

Will we still be the Country of Choice and still be
CANADA if we continue to make the changes forced on us
by the people from other countries who have come to
live in CANADA because it is the Country of
Choice??????

Think about it!
IMMIGRANTS, NOT CANADIAN'S, MUST ADAPT.
It is Time for CANADA to Speak up.
If you agree - pass This along.



To: Stephen O who wrote (12475)11/30/2007 9:30:14 AM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck  Respond to of 37187
 
However I'm in favour of using a Taser when the alternative is guns.

Personally I would rather be shot to death than electrocuted to death.



To: Stephen O who wrote (12475)11/30/2007 9:32:12 AM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37187
 
Taser firms picked up coroner's tab to give lectures
CAROLINE ALPHONSO AND JESSICA LEEDER AND OMAR EL AKKAD

From Friday's Globe and Mail

November 30, 2007 at 4:22 AM EST

TORONTO; LAS VEGAS — Taser International and another company closely linked to the manufacturer have paid the way for Ontario's deputy chief coroner to lecture at their conferences on the phenomenon of "excited delirium," a medically unrecognized term that the company often cites as a reason people die after being tasered.

James Cairns, one of the country's most high-profile coroners, who publicly advocates the use of the stun gun, has become one of the top Canadian experts Taser officials turn to for help shoring up public support for their products in times of crisis. Since the death of Robert Dziekanski, a Polish immigrant, at Vancouver International Airport last month, Taser has repeatedly urged journalists to contact Dr. Cairns for his pro-taser views.

Dr. Cairns has recently given seminars at two conferences hosted by Taser International - one in July in Chicago and another last year in Las Vegas.

He has also spoken at a Las Vegas conference for the Institute for the Prevention of In-Custody Deaths, a small private company with ties to Taser. It is headed by John Peters, a communications specialist who often acts as a course instructor for Taser International. Its only other director is Michael Brave, a Taser legal executive.



Clay Winn of Taser International demonstrates one of the company's stun guns in a 2002 file photo. (Joe Cavaretta/Associated Press)

Videos

Vancouver taser incident

Warning graphic content: Footage of final moments of Robert Dziekanski's life

Symposium aims to define 'excited delirium'
How Taser International wins in the courtroom
RCMP to take probe of taser victim to Poland
Dr. Cairns was slated to deliver a talk yesterday, titled "Excited Delirium Deaths: Public Inquiry Process; ED Training for Ontario Provincial Police Officer and its Impact on the Coroner's Office" at the institute's 2007 conference. He dropped out because he was testifying at an inquiry in Ontario, where he admitted to shielding disgraced pathologist Charles Smith.

In an interview with The Globe and Mail yesterday, Dr. Cairns said he doesn't believe his participation at the conferences is a conflict of interest. He said he attends the conferences on vacation time and paid his own way to attend the first one.

However, he allowed Taser and the institute to pay his hotel and travel expenses for subsequent conferences.

Bonita Porter, Ontario's chief coroner, said it is not uncommon for members of her staff to have expenses paid by conference hosts.

"If he's going to share our experiences and it might improve public safety anywhere, I don't see how that could be considered to be a conflict," she said.

But Dr. Cairns's attendance raises questions about the appearance of bias when probing the issue of whether tasers can kill. While he has not presided over any taser-related inquests, his expert opinion on the role of tasers in certain in-custody deaths has often been solicited. At a 2005 inquest, he testified that an Ontario man, who was tasered three times by police and died less than an hour later in hospital, was not killed by the taser because of the time lapse between the shocks and his death.

The year before, Dr. Cairns urged the Toronto Police Services Board to expand the use of tasers, saying: "I am absolutely convinced tasers will save lives instead of taking lives. And I hope some day, if I am in the position, please taser me before you shoot me."

Dr. Cairns defended his attendance at various Taser conferences. He said he doesn't accept a fee for speaking to avoid any potential conflicts of interest.

"I am not an agent for Taser or anything else. I do not own Taser shares. I wanted there to be no conflict of interest," he said, adding: "I have been invited to many other conferences across the world to talk about things. In those situations, it's always the same."

Taser International did not return phone calls.

According to Mr. Peters's write-up of the 2006 Taser conference in Las Vegas, Dr. Cairns gave a talk in which he "graphically emphasized ... that none of the numerous in-custody death cases which he has been intimately involved with were caused by the deployment of Taser devices."

On the subject of hosting a seminar on excited delirium at the Taser conferences, Dr. Cairns said: "I think the more that we understand about all these issues, the better."