SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (249825)11/27/2007 7:47:31 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 281500
 
JERUSALEM, Nov. 27 — A Palestinian man was killed in the West Bank city of Hebron on Tuesday as Palestinian Authority police officers loyal to President Mahmoud Abbas fired their weapons to disperse protests against the Middle East peace gathering taking place in Annapolis, Md.
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
Abid Katib/Getty Images

Palestinians protested this week's Middle East peace conference on Tuesday in Gaza.

In Gaza, which is controlled by the Islamic group Hamas, huge crowds estimated at over 100,000 came out to protest the Annapolis meeting.

The circumstances of the man’s death were not immediately clear, but medical workers said he had been shot in the chest, according to news reports. The protesters and the police were also reported to have been throwing stones at each other.

A police spokesman in Hebron sent a statement to reporters denying that the police had killed the man, identified as Hisham al-Baradei, in his 30s.

The Hebron demonstration was one of several in the West Bank organized by Hizb-ut-Tahrir — the Islamic Liberation Party — a small, unarmed, pan-Islamic group that advocates the return of the Caliphate and that has recently become more active in the Palestinian territories.

The Palestinian Authority had announced a ban on all demonstrations and press conferences during the Annapolis meeting, enforcing a state of emergency it declared after Hamas took over Gaza in a brief factional war in June.

Hizb-ut-Tahrir is independent of Hamas and criticized it for having participated in Palestinian parliamentary elections in 2006.

In Ramallah, the police used batons, tear gas and fired into the air to hold back about 300 Islamic demonstrators as they tried to march from a city mosque. Dozens of protesters were arrested; some journalists were also beaten and briefly detained. Police officers had broken up a smaller demonstration by secularist groups earlier in the day.

Inter-Palestinian violence has mostly been confined to Gaza and is much rarer in the Palestinian cities of the West Bank, where the Palestinian Authority, dominated by Mr. Abbas’s Fatah party, holds sway.

In early November members of the Hamas police in Gaza shot and killed seven Fatah supporters when they broke up a rally on the anniversary of the death of the longtime Palestinian leader and Fatah founder, Yasir Arafat.

Baher Assaf, a spokesman for Hizb-ut-Tahrir, said in a statement that the Palestinian Authority police had “used brutal force” against the marchers in the West Bank, including live ammunition, killing one and wounding “hundreds.”

Mr. Assaf called the Annapolis meeting, where Israeli and Palestinian leaders announced their intention to launch serious peace talks, “a conspiracy against the Islamic nation.”

The Palestinian Authority minister for prisoner affairs, Ashraf Ajrami, told the Associated Press that there was a “plot to harm the standing” of the Abbas government while the Palestinian president is in the international limelight. Mr. Ajrami said the government “must investigate the events surrounding the incident” in which the protester died.

Protesters aside, many Palestinians in Ramallah seemed apathetic about the Annapolis meeting. At the downtown Palestine coffee shop, Al-Jazeera news channel was on mute as customers played cards and listened to Arabic music over the radio. The proprietor, Jamal, 48, said people were not interested in Annapolis “because there were so many conferences that led to nothing.”

A Hamas protester in Gaza, Asma Al-Fayoumi, 17, said: “There is a division among Palestinians. There are those after food, life, those that are materialistic, like Abbas, and there are those like us who are seeking life after death,” she said.

The large turnout in Gaza pleased her. “There are those who still enjoy good conscience,” she said.

Early Tuesday, Israeli forces shot and killed a Palestinian man who had been moving close to them in the southern Gaza Strip, an army spokeswoman said. He turned out to have been unarmed, she said. Hamas said that three of its militants were killed in two other clashes with Israeli forces in Gaza.
Khaled Abu Aker contributed reporting from Ramallah and Taghreed El-Khodary from Gaza City.



To: michael97123 who wrote (249825)11/28/2007 2:58:58 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Here's how young Palestinians have been educated since 1994:

The following is the Executive Summary of the PMW schoolbook report:

From nationalist battle to religious conflict:
New 12th Grade Palestinian schoolbooks present a world without Israel

February 2007

Written by
Itamar Marcus, Director, Palestinian Media Watch
Barbara Crook, Associate Director, Palestinian Media Watch
With PMW research staff

"The Ribat for Allah is one of the actions related to Jihad for Allah, it means: Being found in areas where there is a struggle between Muslims and their enemies... the endurance of Palestine’s people on their land … is one of the greatest of the Ribat and they are worthy of a great reward from Allah."[Islamic Education, grade 12, pp. 86-87]

Table of Contents:

Executive Summary
Background
Findings

The Report
1. Fighting Israel until liberation - is religious battle of Islam
2. The "state" of "Palestine" exists in a world without Israel
3. A visual world without Israel: on all maps "Palestine" exists, Israel does not
4. Rejection of Israel's right to exist: Israel's founding was "a catastrophe that is unprecedented in history"
5. Holocaust Denial: World War II without a Holocaust
6. Palestinians depicted as victims of the racist "Zionist Enemy"
7. Terminology of disdain and demonization in schoolbooks
8. Jihad and Shahada – Martyrdom for Allah
9. USA - enemy of Palestinians, leader of "Clash of Civilizations"
10. Minimizing the Peace Processes between Israel and its neighbors
Appendix 1: About the books - Palestinian Curriculum Development Center (PCDC)
Appendix 2: Names of Palestinian Schools
Conclusion

Executive Summary
Background
At the end of 2006, the Palestinian Authority (PA) Ministry of Higher Education introduced new 12th grade schoolbooks, written by the Center for Developing the Palestinian Curricula. The center is comprised of Palestinian educators appointed by the Fatah governments of Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas, and directed by Dr. Naim Abu Al-Humos, former PA Minister of Higher Education, appointed in 2002. The center is backed by foreign funding, with special thanks to Belgium noted in the new schoolbooks. Before the year 2000, the schoolbooks used in the Palestinian Authority were primarily Jordanian and Egyptian books, republished by the PA. Between 2000 and 2005, responding to widespread international criticism of the old textbooks, the PA Ministry of Education issued new textbooks for Grades 1 through 11. This report by Palestinian Media Watch reviews the following new schoolbooks for Grade 12, recently introduced into PA schools:
• Physical Geography and Human Geography
• History of the Arabs and the World in the 20th Century
• Contemporary Problems
• Islamic Education
• Arabic Language, Analysis, Literature and Criticism
• Arabic Language and the Science of Language
• Mathematics
• Scientific Culture

Findings
PMW has found that the new 12th grade Palestinian schoolbooks make no attempt to educate for peace and coexistence with Israel. Indeed, the opposite is true: The teachings repeatedly reject Israel's right to exist, present the conflict as a religious battle for Islam, teach Israel’s founding as imperialism, and actively portray a picture of the Middle East, both verbally and visually, in which Israel does not exist at all.

The following description of Israel's founding represents the dominant dogma about Israel in Palestinian schoolbooks:

"Palestine’s war ended with a catastrophe that is unprecedented in history, when the Zionist gangs stole Palestine and expelled its people from their cities, their villages, their lands and their houses, and established the State of Israel." [Arabic Language, Analysis, Literature and Criticism, grade 12, p. 104]

Defining Israel's founding as a "catastrophe unprecedented in history," “a theft perpetrated by "Zionist gangs," together with numerous other hateful descriptions of Israel as "colonial imperialist" and "racist," compounded by the presentation of the conflict as a religious war, leaves no latitude for students to have positive or even neutral attitudes towards Israel. This negative imagery and religious packaging are compounded by hateful presentations of Israeli policy. The young students are imbued with a Palestinian identity as “victims” just by virtue of Israel's existence. The well-meaning student is left with no logical justification or religious option to accept Israel as a neighbor or to seek coexistence. Given the total rejection of Israel's right to exist, on nationalistic and religious grounds, Palestinian terror against Israel since Israel's founding in 1948 is defined as: "resistance … acts of most glorious heroism." [Arabic Language, Analysis, Literature and Commentary, grade 12 p 105]

Fighting Israel is a religious battle of Islam
But PA educators teach that fighting Israel is not merely a territorial conflict, but also a religious battle for Islam. The schoolbooks define the conflict with Israel as "Ribat for Allah" – "one of the actions related to Jihad for Allah, and it means: Being found in areas where there is a struggle between Muslims and their enemies." [Islamic Education, grade 12, p. 86]. Israel is thus stigmatized as existing on Islam's land, and fighting Israel is transformed from an Arab nationalistic goal into an uncompromising battle for God. Moreover, the youth are taught that their specific conflict with Israel - Ribat for "Palestine" - is "one of the greatest of the Ribat, and they [Palestinians] are worthy of a great reward from Allah". [Ibid, pp.86- 87].

The world without Israel - Israel does not exist at all
Beyond looking to the future, the educators have built a picture – both verbally and visually – of the present world, a world in which Israel does not exist. "Palestine" today is said to be a special "state" (Arabic – "Dawla" = state, not a geographical region) with water access to both the Mediterranean and the Red Seas, a situation possible only if Israel does not exist. [Physical Geography and Human Geography, grade 12, p. 105] Likewise the size of the "state" of "Palestine" is said to be more than 10,000 sq. km., which is the figure one gets only if Israel did not exist, as the full West Bank and Gaza Strip total only 6220 sq. km.
[Physical Geography and Human Geography, grade 12, p. 107]

Maps of the region likewise teach children to visualize a world without Israel, as Israel does not exist on any map and its area is marked as "Palestine."

Since all of Israel and all its cities are taught to be an "occupation" of "Palestine," and "Palestine" in all the school books replaces all of Israel, the following teaching can only mean that Israel's destruction is inevitable:

"Palestine will be liberated by its men, its women, its young ones and its elderly."
[Arabic Language and the Science of Language, grade 12, p. 44]

Terminology of Disdain
The terminology that the educators have chosen to use throughout the schoolbooks reinforces the message that youth should not accept Israel as a neighbor with a right to exist. The following terms all replace Israel, its founders, and status: “The Zionist enemy;" “The Zionist entity;” “The enemy of this people;” “The Zionist gangs;” “Zionist Imperialist plan.” Israel’s creation is “the occupation;” “stole Palestine;” “stole its land;” “in 1948, when the Jews occupied Palestine.” Palestinians are said to suffer from: “imperialist persecution, a life of exile, and the theft of freedom of thought and culture;” “massacre” and much more. (All sources appear in report.) With these as the educational messages, the next generation of Palestinian youth is actively being prevented from having any reasonable possibility of accepting Israel as a neighbor in reconciliation and peace.

The US and the West - a "Clash of Civilizations"
The current relationship with the West is described as a "Clash of Civilizations" between the West, led by the United States, and the Islamic-Arab world. [Contemporary Problems, grade 12, p. 92.] Islam promotes Human Rights [ibid, pp. 95-96], the US and the West, "the colonialist states, are taking advantage of it", "for interfering in the matters of other states, as is happening in Afghanistan, Iraq, Darfur…" [ibid, p. 101] America and Russia are guilty of "violations of international humanitarian law in Iraq and Afghanistan and …in Chechnya." [ibid, p. 108] Fighting against American and British soldiers in Iraq is called "brave resistance to liberate Iraq" against "occupation." [History of the Arabs and the World in the 20th Century, grade 12, p.147]

Conclusion
One of the most meaningful gauges of the ideology and aspirations of a people is the education of its youth. For this reason, the new Palestinian Authority schoolbooks, introduced in the end of 2006 by the Palestinian Authority (PA) Ministry of Higher Education apparatus, are a continuation of the tragic disappointment of the earlier books. Instead of seizing the opportunity to educate future generations to live with Israel in peace, the PA schoolbooks glorify terror and teach their children to hate Israel, vilify Israel's existence and define the battle with Israel as an uncompromising religious war. Instead of working to minimize the current hate, the new PA curriculum is ingraining it into the next generation’s consciousness, and packaging the war against Israel as existential, mandatory and religious. The new PA schoolbooks are guaranteeing that the next generation will grow up seeing Israel as an illegitimate enemy to be hated, fought, and destroyed, rather than as a neighbor to negotiate with and to ultimately live beside in peace.
frontpagemag.com