Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (11514)	11/28/2007 3:49:45 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

Re: I don’t have any strong opinions about elections in Pakistan. I do. It's pretty much the same story all over. Autocrats need to keep the illusion of an external threat alive so they can maintain their hold on power. This becomes an actual threat because the very Autocracy stokes insurgencies. And, the longer Democratic aspirations of the people are resisted (think: Iran for the archetypal example) the more success the most extreme elements opposing the government begin to have... as the population loses faith in the ability of the more 'milk-toast' elements of the opposition to successfully oppose the Autocrat and his cronies.

To: goldworldnet who wrote (11514)	11/28/2007 4:18:46 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

EXECUTIVE ORDER ON ASSET SEIZURE CASTS A WIDE NET Last July, President Bush issued a broadly-worded executive order authorizing the government to seize the assets of "any person" who threatens the stability of Iraq and, more controversially, any person who provides assistance to such a person. The scope, objectives and precedents of the order -- Executive Order 13,438, "Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq" -- were examined in a new report from the Congressional Research Service. "The broad language of this executive order has been the subject of a degree of criticism as potentially reaching beyond insurgents in Iraq to third parties, such as U.S. citizens, who may unknowingly be providing support for the insurgency," the CRS report noted, citing prior accounts in the Washington Post, TPM Muckraker, and elsewhere. In fact, the potential application of the order appears to be technically unlimited since it includes a recursive clause that has no defined endpoint. Thus, section 1(b) of the Order states that any person who provides goods or services to a person whose actions are proscribed under section 1(a) is himself subject to section 1(a). But then, anyone who provides similar support to that person could likewise be swept up in the expansive terms of the order. And so on, without end. In practice, the application of the order will be defined by implementing regulations to be issued by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, which will also prepare an initial list of blocked individuals and organizations. Those have still not been published. A copy of the new CRS report was obtained by Secrecy News. See "Executive Order 13,438: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq," November 16, 2007: fas.org The text of executive order 13,438 is here: fas.org