Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gg cox who wrote (25808)	11/29/2007 12:37:29 AM
From: Snowshoe	Respond to of 218308

Yeah, $7000 is too high. But your $2600 might be a little low, considering the extra piping together with the learning curve. I figure $4000 might be about right. The Southeast is way behind the curve in dealing with this drought. They should have shut that clown down a long time ago.

To: gg cox who wrote (25808)	11/29/2007 1:25:09 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218308

Good grief GG, you crazy commie central planning shortage providers and death dealers can't even organize water. <When drought hits, the water hogs and numbskulls have to be weeded out also...society must act with hammer rules, fines, laws> All you need to do is hire somebody who understands that 21st century financial relativity theory of supply/demand/price and hey presto, problems go away. Put the price of water up, and people use less of it. Keep putting the price up until demand matches how much water is available. There is another component to it too, but I'll leave it to you to try to figure it out. When you give up, I'll tell you the rest. Mqurice