Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (11616)	11/29/2007 2:45:27 PM
From: pompsander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

Rudy may not have had anything to do with slotting these particular expenses in the budgets where they ended up, but as you know, things like this can get corporate executives fired if it was not an approved method of allocation or distribution of expense. This certainly looks...."odd"....and because he was at his mistresses' condo during the times in question, the issue of cover up or hiding the matter comes into play. If it was all on the up and up, wouldn't the expense have just been charged right to the police/security budget for the Mayor? Rudy said last night he was authorized to have 24/7 protection, so why not charge it to the budget where it belonged? Doesn't smell right.