SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (11619)11/29/2007 2:51:07 PM
From: pompsander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
"This was asked in the debate and answered satisfactorily."

I think Rudy said that he was entitled to 24/7 police protection. This may well be true. He talked about threats, some known, some not. This, too, may be true.

He did not address why the expenses were charged to, for example, the Office of People with Disabilities. Why charges for these PARTICULAR trips (and not others) were charged to agencies under the Mayor's domain rather than just to his security budget has not been answered by anyone.

Yet.



To: Bill who wrote (11619)11/29/2007 4:05:57 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
Re: "answered satisfactorily."

That particular determination will be up to the primary voters. :-)

(Expect to see several TV ads from his opponents about the matter though....)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News