Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (17883)	12/1/2007 8:22:18 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Your mighty magisterium of science is selling the same snake oil the religious hucksters do and competing for the same dollar. It's all about competing the herd occupied while not noticing they're being stampeded over a cliff.

To: neolib who wrote (17883)	12/1/2007 10:32:39 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

What a wonderful example of how stupid and shallow the neolib logic is. There is no evidence to prove darwinism or man produced CO2 is or will be driving global warming. It is only a faith based belief that allows any one to profess this. So it is logical to describe darwinism or man produced CO2 is driving global warming are determined truth as religions. but science ignoramus have nothing but their religious beliefs they are neolibing it.

To: neolib who wrote (17883)	12/2/2007 4:58:36 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

I have provided a coherent theory and not only does nobody find anything wrong with it, they simply ignore it and then make comments about smelliness of my feet, bad breath and other personal denigration, as though that is a good argument. <don't stoop to try and present a coherent theory of your own, since, a) you can't and b) if you did it would be wrong anyway.> In my decades of experience, when an argument I find compelling is met with that sort of thing, it is invariably because they haven't got any arguments so revert to a personal attack, which is the most pathetic argument of all. I'm long enough in the tooth to know that my ideas can easily be wrong. But if people can't explain why I'm wrong, I continue with the idea because it's probably correct. Mqurice