Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (17894)	12/1/2007 7:23:01 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36921

Strawman arguments are a sign of weakness. I agree. Then you should stop making broad statements about AGW skeptics being paid by tobacco companies. What evidence do you have, any scrap of evidence, anecdotal or of any description, that Robert Marsham, Richard Fitter, and others, fudged any figures?? Their studies involved many thousands of observations covering hundreds of species over more then 200 years. None. But I asked the question in re to the many unnamed members of the public "dedicated observors" that got into recording FFD's as to whether they could have competed to record the earliest FFD. Seems like a fair question. You have a strange idea of a vague claim Message 24098451; No that was a vague claim. That you've subsequently backed it up by finding claims that FFD's have advanced 4.5 days or 8 days or whatever for various species doesn't support your broad claim that flowers were blooming a month earlier now than a century ago.