Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (17903)	12/1/2007 9:02:35 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Or do you think that somehow medical science has it's own set of rules which result in "good" science, while those who study other sciences all get "duped" somehow? The only science that is "bad" science is the science that results in implications that challenges our habitual way of living and powerful vested interests. Any other science is OK. Especially the kind that helps those same powerful vested interests make lots of money.

To: neolib who wrote (17903)	12/1/2007 9:24:58 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Sorry I thought this was the environmental thread and we were discussing faith based science. I'm all for any science that alleviates human suffering, i.e. medicine or finds more oil i.e. geology and even those sciences make a lot of mistakes.