Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.hinton who wrote (250296)	12/2/2007 4:05:14 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

well i am sorry to break an illusion but this is more about the haves and the have nots. Gee, would that explain the terrorism pouring out of Subsaharan Africa? Um, no. Try again. Does it explain the terrorism of Osama bin Laden (wealthy playboy), Aymin al Zawarhiri (doctor) or Mohammed Atta (engineer)? Nope. Try again. most agree that it is the third world that will suffer the most from climate disruption How convenient to come to such a conclusion. There is no evidence, but that doesn't stop the IPCC as we have seen. Remember the 2004 announcement that global warming causes more hurricaines, a conclusion supported by no researchers in the field? Those predicting the dire results for the third world wouldn't happen to be volunteers to help redistribute the wealth from the rich to the poor countries, now would they? Inquiring minds want to know. This is all political science. Political science is bad science.