SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (17977)12/4/2007 12:42:29 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 36917
 
"Some evidence for" doesn't preclude other evidence or claims for the opposite.

Also 10 years is one specific time frame, you can have increased melting over a ten year time frame with less melting over a longer or shorter time frame.

Related to that idea -

"Data from the United States' National Climactic Data Center show that temperatures in Greenland for the last decade are hardly unusual when compared to temperatures for the last 100 years. The period from 1915 through 1965 -- an entire half–century -- was about two degrees warmer than it is today."

cato.org



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (17977)12/4/2007 4:07:57 PM
From: HPilot  Respond to of 36917
 
Greenland is in the Arctic, the Arctic is warming, the Antarctic is cooling.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (17977)12/5/2007 10:39:29 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36917
 
One more time for the mentally retarded.
This is what the IPCC fecal brains models predict as the signature of human created CO2 global warming.

This is current reality, true measurements.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News