SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ManyMoose who wrote (230377)12/5/2007 12:09:28 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793843
 
I don't follow your motivation.

Lane always has the same motivation. Start an endless discussion. :>)



To: ManyMoose who wrote (230377)12/5/2007 12:28:27 AM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793843
 
I don't follow your motivation.

Her interest is to discuss (or parse if you will) for the sake of discussion (or parsing). No more motivation than that.



To: ManyMoose who wrote (230377)12/5/2007 7:34:19 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793843
 
I don't follow your motivation.

I stated my motivation explicitly. You have only to read to find my motivation.

"...nor an agenda other than my generic anti-polarization hobby-horse."

You overstated your case when you erroneously claimed that the two clauses stand independently. It was your polarizing excessiveness to which I took exception, not the right to bear arms.



To: ManyMoose who wrote (230377)12/5/2007 12:25:12 PM
From: Oral Roberts  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793843
 
Her motivation is to argue, plain and simple. She never has any interest other then to stir the pot and argue the meaning of is. A bigger waste of bandwidth on this thread will not be found and quite frankly it's irritating as hell even though I have her on ignore.