SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tkala who wrote (101760)12/6/2007 11:35:35 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
" In fact, as of September 30, 2003, the total "fails to deliver" of UNIVERSAL's shares outstanding was de minimis."

VI. OTHER FALSE OR MISLEADING STATEMENTS

A. Naked Short Selling Statements

74) In September 2003, Altomare began publicly suggesting that so-called "naked short selling" of Universal shares had artificially depressed Universal's stock price. In early October, Altomare stated in an interview that without the downward pressure of "naked shorting" Universal's share price would be much higher. In fact, as of September 30, 2003, the total "fails to deliver" of Universal's shares outstanding was de minimis.

75) In addition, none of Altomare's public statements regarding naked short selling disclosed Universal's issuance of hundreds of millions Universal shares to the re-sellers who had dumped these shares into the market.

76) In a subsequent interview with Dow Jones Newswire, Altomare falsely stated that Universal provided the Commission enforcement staff with 11,000 to 12,000 pages of documents in response to a staff subpoena requesting documents relating to short selling of Universal shares. In fact, Universal's total production in response to the SEC subpoena was only 295 pages, none of which provided evidence that investors or brokers were intentionally failing to deliver Universal shares in connection with "naked short selling."

B. Announcement of Airline Acquisition

77) In fall 2003, Altomare and the owner of North American Airlines ("North American"), signed an option for the sale of the airline to Universal. To fund the 50% non-refundable $1 million deposit required by the owner, Altomare and Neuhaus agreed that Neuhaus would wire the $1 million on Universal's behalf in exchange for 20 million "free trading" Universal shares and 20 million restricted Universal shares. With Universal's stock trading at $0.05 at that time, Altomare and Neuhaus knew that Neuhaus could recover the entire $1 million cost of the deposit by selling the 20'million "free trading" shares even if Universal's announcement of the deal failed to cause a jump in Universal's stock price.

78) On October 7, after North American's owner resisted Altomare's requests to make an exception to the contract's confidentiality provisions so that Universal could issue a press release announcing the contract, Neuhaus sent the owner an e-mail falsely stating that SEC rules required Universal to make a public announcement.

79) After receiving Neuhaus' e-mail, North American's owner relented and on Sunday, October 12, 2003 Altomare issued a press release, reviewed by Neuhaus, announcing the contract. In an apparent attempt to convince investors that Universal and Altomare had a serious stake in completing the acquisition, the release, quoting Altomare, stated: "We have paid a $1,000,000 deposit, 50% of which is non-refundable."

80) The release failed to disclose that the deposit had been financed through an illegal issuance of Universal shares to Neuhaus and that Neuhaus planned to sell the shares into the market after the announcement.

81) On Monday morning, October 13, 2003 the stock opened at $0.108, an increase of 50% over the previous Friday's close, and traded as high as $0.131 on volume of 132 million shares.

82) Neuhaus sold more than 1 million shares on October 13, 2003 and continued selling an average of 1 million shares per day over the next several weeks. The sales covered the entire cost of the $1 million deposit by October 22 and generated another $1 million in proceeds by November 6, 2003.

83) Mendiratta sold more than 500,000 Universal shares on October 13, 2003 and continued selling substantial amounts thereafter.

C. Statements Regarding Private Postal Network Membership

84) Each of Universal's eight most recent filings with the Commission falsely stated that its private postal network, called WorldPost, had 8,000, and in later filings 9,000, members. In fact, stores listed on the network's web site as members of the network are not actually members.

D. False Sarbanes-Oxley Certifications by Altomare

85) In each of Universal's periodic filings with the Commission since its June 30, 2002 Form 10-KSB, Altomare falsely certified that to the best of his knowledge there were no untrue statement of material fact or omission of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading.
------------------------------

Doc 1 - OCR extract
Pacer DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:07-mc-00115U.S. District Court - TX
Northern District of Texas (Dallas)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:07-mc-00115
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Universal Express, Inc. et al



To: tkala who wrote (101760)12/6/2007 12:42:52 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
12/04/2007 262 JUDGMENT #07,2308 in favor of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission against Tarun Mendiratta in the amount of $ 415,800.00. (Signed by Judge Gerard E. Lynch on 12/4/07) (Attachments: # 1 CONSENT, # 2 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL)(ml) (Entered: 12/04/2007)
------------------

Doc 262 extract

JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT TARUN MENDIRATTA

The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a complaint, and Defendant Tarun Mendiratta ("Mendiratta") having filed an answer, admitted the Court's jurisdiction over Mendiratta and the subject matter of this action, consented to entry of this Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction), waived findings of fact and conclusions of law, and waived any right to appeal from this Judgment:

I.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Mendiratta and his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. § 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption:

(a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise;

(b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or

(c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h].

II.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Mendiratta is barred for a period of three years from the date of this Judgment from participating in an offering of penny stock, including engaging in activities with a broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock. A penny stock is any equity security that has a price of less than five dollars, except as provided in Rule 3a51-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [17 C.F.R. § 240.3a51-1].

III.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Mendiratta shall pay disgorgement of $385,000, representing ill-gotten gains from the activities alleged in the complaint, plus prejudgment interest thereon of $30,800, for total disgorgement of $415,800. Mendiratta shall satisfy this obligation by paying $415,800 to the Clerk of this Court within ten business days of entry of this Judgment, together with a cover letter identifying Mendiratta as a defendant in this action; setting forth the title and civil action number of this action and the name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of such payment and letter to the SEC's counsel in this action. By making this payment, Mendiratta relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds, and no part of the funds shall be returned to Mendiratta. The Clerk shall deposit the funds into an interest bearing account with the Court Registry Investment System ("CRIS") or any other type of interest bearing account that is utilized by the Court. These funds, together with any interest and income earned thereon (collectively, the "Fund"), shall be held in the interest bearing account until further order of the Court.

IV.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Mendiratta shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.

V.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.

VI.

There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice.

Dated: December 4, 2007

Signature of Gerard E. Lynch
United States District Judge



To: tkala who wrote (101760)1/3/2008 6:00:42 PM
From: Clase Azul  Respond to of 122087
 
rong