Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (110125)	12/8/2007 10:08:37 AM
From: Freedom Fighter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

KT, No, you are trying to deflect the conversation from a very important national security issue like poor intelligence to nonsensical matters that can score political points for democrats and other Bush haters (just like a loyal partisan would). If we were actually close to doing something aggressive, you might have a point, but we weren't and you don't. The proof will be that rhetoric is going to remain exactly the same. The goal of preventing Iran from getting nukes and eliminating the downsides risks of that is unchanged. So aggressive rhetoric etc.. will continue to be used. The only thing that has changed is that we apparently have a lot more time to work this out and the probability of something aggressive happening is dramatically lowered for the time being.