Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: loantech who wrote (53890)	12/9/2007 4:22:16 AM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78424

"Sometimes he is right on sometimes not. Same as all of us." yep just a bit more radical but so what? In this arena you can find many many financial commentators with a slant towards gold saying far far worse things than I do. grain of salt, sure, why not? We can all live together if we don't take ourselves too seriously.

To: loantech who wrote (53890)	12/9/2007 12:23:14 PM
From: tyc:>	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78424

>>Do you have health insurance because you wan to get sick ? An explanation of my "doubts" is needed. They stem from my conclusion that goldbugs would be disappointed if the price of gold fell, signifying that the troubles were over and "insurance" was no longer necessary. It's not insurance, it's a bet on and for an outcome (the more disastrous the better). It seems to me that may be why the political diatribe is tolerated, even applauded, on this thread. To suggest that goldbugs believe in gold as insurance is like calling RE's hatreds "philosophy".