Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (18130)	12/9/2007 11:12:48 PM
From: Archie Meeties	Respond to of 36921

whrc.org

To: TimF who wrote (18130)	12/15/2007 12:38:24 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

Are you asserting they are in doubt or are you just playing games? I'm asking you to compare the methods of creationists with the global warming deniers, and then explain why you accept the same techniques when used by one group (the AGW deniers) but not when used by the other group (creationists). The articles and ideas you link regarding AGW use pretty much the same tactics used by creationists. So that is why I ask how on earth you accept evolution. Evolution has similar holes just like AGW, but for some reason you don't doubt evolution. Why? Regarding strawmen and arguing. Go read the creation/evolution debate. People argue many points of that all the time. The fact that degreed individuals argue does not mean the arguments have merit. They can still be strawman arguments, with one side not thinking clearly.