Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (18800)	12/10/2007 1:31:16 PM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224777

No, because they were his security - not his girl friend's security. So if the Highway Patrol was his security, why is the New York Police not Guliani's security? Do you even understand your own statements?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (18800)	12/10/2007 2:32:53 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 224777

OPINION IN BRIEF “[N]one of the [Clinton] scandals were bolder and publicly vexing than the fact that whole cases of FBI files of Clinton opponents or antagonists were missing and mysteriously popped up in Hillary’s possession. The fact that many of the names found in such files were also under special audit from the IRS—many for several years in a row—under the Clinton regime troubled the few Americans who followed the news closely enough to understand it. The willingness that such executive power would be focused to abuse their ideological enemies is revolting and repulsive. In the years since Hillary has repackaged herself as the ‘moderate’ Senator from New York thus further distancing herself from the trouble of the Arkansas days. But make no mistake—everything ugly associated with the word Clinton is back. Rigged appearances, intimidation of the press, and the discovery that research hacks are even now sitting in some campaign office basement putting together strategy hits for the assassination of their current opponents—its all back.” —Kevin McCullough

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (18800)	12/10/2007 3:32:41 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224777

Nancy Pelosi and other Dems approved water boarding in 2002..do you have a problem with that fact? They also remained silent when they were informed an interrogation tape would be destroyed to protect CIA sources. Will Ms Pelosi & the others be called as witnesses during the Dems proposed congressional hearings on the issue?