Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cautious_Optimist who wrote (6726)	12/11/2007 6:38:02 PM
From: sageyrain	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24232

aahh, yes. I haven't taken too close a look at this guy/group yet, need to look closer at their ideas, thanks.

To: Cautious_Optimist who wrote (6726)	12/11/2007 6:56:57 PM
From: sageyrain	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24232

"Surf the site and form your own conclusions about the bias or merit of this study and its authors." Hee hee, have looked at the site and yes the CFP, I would agree, is definiteyly biased. I don't know if the article' posting at CFP has anything to do with it's merit as I am not a climatologist, I haven't made a stab yet at their actual publications, and am not familar with this idea of the disparity between atmospheric and surface temperature readings as an argument against human-induced warming. Any "climatology for dummiew" type input here would be greatly appreciated with respect to their thesis.