Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: loantech who wrote (54140)	12/12/2007 12:32:27 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

Me too, join the club ... opens up all sorts of questions, doesn't it - when is it a breakaway gap that you don't have to worry about, 'discovery gap' that should be called in explo juniors ... does the place of the gap in the chart matter? - example gqc.v as in the post you're responding to - does it make sense for that gap from the .30s to fill? ... what about multiple gaps, example kxl.v - has two gaps, one very low, one quite high, might it make sense for the upper to fill but not the lower? ... if discovery gaps must fill, could an argument be made for management to leak good results so that the stock can melt up gracefully into news day? ... i don't know the answers, if i did i'd be a lot richer and not have to take my beer cans into town today to put bids under some of these puppies ... like Step says, it's a game of percentages, you play the likeliest odds as you see them lgo.v - news out, starting fease on Maracas, from .50 it's six-bagger material in two three years imho, be nice to have sold more above the spring/summer gaps and have the cash now, i shoulda thought of that -g-